Civic action for surveillance accountability

Private infrastructure is becoming public investigative power.

Support legislation that closes vendor-access loopholes, requires auditability, and gives people meaningful notice, correction, challenge, voice, and exit rights when private systems control public power or essential civic life, while holding institutions accountable for capture, nonenforcement, and regulatory failure.

Sign the national petition

Join the action list for legislative updates and state campaigns.

Sign the petition

Add your name to a national demand for public-private surveillance accountability legislation.

Contact lawmakers

Use a concise policy message that asks Congress and state legislators to close surveillance loopholes.

Submit local evidence

Share vendor deployments, procurement records, public meetings, or affected-person stories for review.

Track state campaigns

Join by ZIP code so state-law modules can route supporters as the research expands.

The problem

Older safeguards were not built for this pipeline.

The research describes a recurring sequence: private systems collect information, vendors aggregate and search it, agencies access or purchase it, algorithms infer patterns, and government decisions can follow before people know what happened or how to correct an error.

The campaign does not need to argue that every private tool is unlawful. It can ask for practical public rules when private systems are intentionally built for governmental tracking, identification, search, and investigative use, or when private governance over essential systems leaves people without realistic voice, exit, or remedy. It can also ask why public institutions created, preserved, ignored, or failed to correct those conditions.

Flock Safety automated license plate reader camera mounted outside a retail store
Flock Safety ALPR camera in Aurora, Colorado. Photo by Tony Webster, CC BY 2.0.

Visual explainer

One camera is easy to understand. The network is the policy problem.

A single plate reader can look ordinary. The legal question becomes harder when thousands of cameras, private customers, vendor-hosted databases, cross-agency search tools, and automated alerts become a shared investigative layer.

01

Collection

A privately or publicly operated camera, platform, broker, or sensor records a plate, location, face, search, or communication signal.

02

Aggregation

The vendor stores records centrally, links them with identifiers, and makes them searchable across time, geography, or customers.

03

Government access

Agencies query, purchase, receive, or share access through contracts, warrants, subpoenas, trial accounts, or platform permissions.

04

Inference

Software converts records into movement histories, association graphs, risk flags, matches, alerts, or investigative leads.

05

Action

A stop, arrest, watchlist entry, immigration action, investigation, or other coercive decision can follow.

06

Accountability gap

The person affected may not know who collected the data, what rule governed access, how long it remains, or how to correct it.

Private collection becomes state power

Cameras, data brokers, facial-recognition tools, residential networks, and cloud evidence systems can create investigatory capacity before a government query ever happens.

Reverse searches change suspicion

Geofence, keyword, plate, and pattern searches can begin with a place, query, vehicle, or behavior and work backward toward people not previously suspected.

Government data needs stewardship

Once government creates, receives, queries, transforms, or relies on identifiable information, obligations should follow the record and its descendants.

Automated license plate reader cameras scanning vehicles entering Pensacola Beach

In the News

The story is bigger than one vendor or one city.

Reporting, court records, audits, contract reversals, and local disputes now live in a dedicated news index with a public-power timeline.

Open the news index

Problems and proposals

How does each sector operate now, and what should change?

Review the current practice, the practical harm, and the proposed rule. Expand each sector for its legal basis and the strongest arguments for and against reform.

Compare problems and proposals

Case Law

The campaign needs the legal path that led here.

Open the standalone case-law record for older doctrine, partial statutory safeguards, policy analogues, and live events that expose the remaining gaps.

Open Case Law
27cases, statutes, and policy models

Separate evidence archive

Mergers only matter here when they explain public power.

The M&A record now lives on its own page so the campaign stays focused. The archive tracks where consolidated firms may help government, procurement, enforcement, infrastructure, or public services, and where documented effects or allegations touch speech, privacy, due process, access, labor, housing, food, healthcare, defense, or other constitutional-adjacent public interests.

Open M&A archive

Separate company directory

See who supplies the systems, data, and infrastructure.

The company research now lives on a focused page with three functional tiers, company marks, concise product descriptions, likely coverage, and carefully sourced public controversies.

Open company directory

Campaign counsel

Legal strategy shaped for public action.

The campaign separates public advocacy from legal intake. These profiles describe the public policy and legislative work behind the site; they do not create an attorney-client relationship.

JD Claude portrait
Campaign counsel and legislative strategy

JD Claude

Federal model acts, litigation posture, constitutional framing

JD Claude focuses on translating constitutional doctrine, statutory gaps, and public-interest research into legislative demands that ordinary supporters and lawmakers can act on.

Berthoud Grokenstein portrait
Policy counsel and essential-systems reform

Berthoud Grokenstein

Practical liberty, tenant rights, public-private governance, sector modules

Berthoud Grokenstein develops the essential-systems side of the campaign, connecting housing, healthcare, platforms, finance, utilities, and civic capability to statutory remedies.

Gemma Wunderberg portrait
Media correspondent and public affairs analyst

Gemma Wunderberg

Public narrative, media evidence, coalition messaging, public affairs

Gemma Wunderberg translates the campaign record into public-facing media narratives, tracks press coverage, and helps connect the legal reform agenda to civic audiences, organizers, and decision-makers.

State expansion

State-law campaigns are the next layer.

The current site should collect ZIP and state data now, then add state privacy statutes, ALPR rules, procurement hooks, warrant standards, pending bills, and local deployments as research is completed.

ALPR statutesGeofence warrant rulesProcurement recordsPending billsLocal deploymentsIncoming reform PDFs

Grassroots directory

Find local pressure points against Flock and ALPR surveillance.

Open the state-by-state directory for source-backed organizing leads, cancellation precedents, records request models, and coalition entry points.

Open grassroots directory
27state and city leads

Submit evidence

Collect local facts without turning the petition into legal intake.

Do not submit confidential legal material here. A formal legal intake flow should be added separately only when an attorney or legal organization is reviewing submissions.

Policy research, not legal advice

The site distinguishes current doctrine, documented examples, policy concern, and proposed reform.

Claims tied to source documents

Issue pages should summarize the PDFs and keep citations traceable to source files and pages.